Georgia Tech Research Horizons

Chemistry without Chemicals

Supercomputer helps theoretical chemists understand complex processes.

By John Toon

There are no test tubes, reagent bottles, fume hoods or hazardous waste containers in the laboratories of theoretical chemists Rigoberto Hernandez and David Sherrill.
photo by Gary Meek

Theoretical chemists Rigoberto Hernandez, left, and David Sherrill are using a powerful IBM supercomputer to ask more complex questions and get faster, more detailed answers without mixing the first chemical. The technique provides clues to chemical engineering mysteries that cannot be investigated any other way, and reduces trial and error in research. (300-dpi JPEG version - 747k)

The work of these researchers takes place instead at the keyboard of a powerful supercomputer. Using models based on deep knowledge of chemical processes, the computer simulates the hopping of electrical charges and breaking of chemical bonds at a level of detail no other technique could provide.

Though the results must still be verified by old-fashioned experimentation, computational chemistry allows scientists to ask more complex questions and get faster, more detailed answers without mixing the first chemical. The technique provides clues to chemical engineering mysteries that cannot be investigated any other way, and reduces trial and error in research.

At the Georgia Institute of Technology, researchers use this technique to study protein folding, anti-cancer drugs, molecules key to the vision process and polymerization.

"If you can do the experiments on the computer and try all the 'what-ifs' that way, at the very end, the one reaction you really need can be done in chemistry," says Hernandez, an assistant professor in the School of Chemistry and Biochemistry. "By finding the very best solution on the computer, you can limit the waste products by eliminating trial and error. This doesn't do away with experimentation, but it gives the chemist another tool."

Chemistry in Changing Environments
In common chemical processes, the reactants make up a small part of the overall environment, which does not change substantially as the reaction proceeds. In such systems, the environment is considered to be at equilibrium.

Hernandez, however, studies non-equilibrium reactions in which the reacting chemicals form a large part of the overall environment. In such systems, the environment changes as the reaction proceeds, affecting the chemistry in ways that are difficult to model and study. This complex interaction between reaction and changing environment affects the outcome in important ways.

"In many cases, the final properties of the material are determined by their history," he explains. "I want to understand how things are formed, not just to characterize their properties once they are formed."

Protein folding provides an important example. After creation, proteins fold through a complex chemical process that involves as many as 200 different amino acid residues. Different folds give the proteins different properties. In some cases, such as amyloidogenic proteins associated with "Mad Cow Disease," a wrong fold creates a harmful protein: the scrapie form of prions.

"There is increasing evidence that the wrong folds are due to a kinetic or dynamic process," Hernandez adds. "We as dynamicists are asking how a sequence with a given structure goes to that folded structure. By understanding those dynamics, we would be able to say something about altering the sequence and preventing it from folding that way."

A supercomputer model accounting for complex changes in reactants and environment may provide answers that researchers could find in no other way.

Among industrial applications is the way in which thermosetting polymer materials form. Used in applications such as microchip packaging and automobile parts, the starting materials include long-chain polymers, cross-linking agents, fillers and dyes. In manufacturing, the mixture is heated to liquid form, allowing the polymers to react and chemically link into a final product whose properties depend on its thermal history – that is, how quickly it was heated and allowed to cool.

Like protein folding, the polymerization reaction does not occur in equilibrium because the process of cross-linking significantly affects the reaction environment. A clearer understanding of the processing dynamics, obtained through computer models, should give materials scientists better control in selecting the starting materials.

"You would be able not only to predict what a particular composition is going to do, but also determine what the initial conditions should be for a desired outcome," Hernandez says. "That would allow you to design thermosetting polymeric blends that would be optimal for your particular mold or system."

Computational Quantum Chemistry
Understanding complex reactions is also important to Sherrill, an assistant professor whose focus is electronic structure theory and its application to photochemistry and highly reactive systems. His work has implications for improving anti-cancer drugs, understanding the process of vision and tracing the role of copper in the body.

The enediyne family of anti-cancer drugs provides a vital weapon in the battle against the dreaded disease. The highly reactive chemicals contain two radicals that "steal" hydrogen atoms from the DNA of cancer cells, triggering destruction of the cells. Although experiments have shown the basic steps of the diradical reaction, detailed computer models could give new insights into how to tune the reactivity by adjusting the chemical structures of the drugs. Having that information would help scientists produce better anti-cancer drugs.

These computational studies will require the development of new theoretical techniques because current models can't accurately describe the highly reactive diradicals, or more generally, any bond-making or bond-breaking processes.

"To get a very detailed understanding of the whole process, going from reactants to products and watching it happen in between, you usually are breaking chemical bonds," Sherrill explains. "You would like to be able to describe that theoretically, including the entire reaction path, not just the beginning and the end."

Sherrill also works with Professor Mostafa El-Sayed and Clemens Burda, both of Georgia Tech's Laser Dynamics Lab, in better understanding a family of molecules essential to the vision process. These molecules twist when they absorb photons of light, a process that has been studied – but not fully explained – using high-speed laser dynamics.

"Apparently something happens during the course of the twisting that isn't completely understood," Sherrill explains. "It is hypothesized that some intermediate structure influences the twisting, but that structure has not been observed. If we can find it through our modeling, it may apply to the whole class of molecules."

Beyond its implications for vision research, the work could lead to improvements in color photography and the capture of solar energy.

In a third major project, Sherrill helps Professor Christoph Fahrni in designing a molecule that will bind to copper ions and emit light. Measuring the phosphorescence would then allow scientists to see where copper concentrates in cells, information important because of the role copper plays in biochemistry.

Fahrni has begun designing candidate molecules in the laboratory even as Sherrill models them on his computer. In this collaboration, theory suggests directions for the experiments to take, and experiments calibrate the theory.

"If the theory gives good predictions, we can go ahead and tweak some of the parameters theoretically and suggest better alternatives that can then be made in the lab," Sherrill says. "This could help keep Christoph from having to make dozens of structures that may not work."

Already, the work with collaborator Professor Alan Gabrielli of Southern Polytechnic State University in Marietta, Ga., has led to unexpected results that further the understanding of the phosphorescence of such probe materials.

New Supercomputer Accelerates Efforts
The computational chemistry work of Hernandez and Sherrill advanced in October 2000 with the installation of a 72-processor IBM SP supercomputer that forms the core of the new Center for Computational Molecular Science and Technology. The machine, shared with other researchers in the College of Sciences and elsewhere at Georgia Tech, is one of the most powerful academic supercomputers in the Southeast.

It promises a dramatic increase in the speed at which simulations run, doing in a few hours what would have taken a week of number crunching on smaller computer workstations. It also allows researchers to undertake more complex and accurate simulations that they could not even attempt before.

"This will allow us to do some very high accuracy calculations on some benchmark molecules that were inaccessible before," Sherrill says. "It will make a tremendous difference."

Because the reactions Hernandez and Sherrill study are so complex, limits on computing power have forced them to rely on approximations that do not take into account all the variables that could influence the outcome. The supercomputer will alter that trade-off, enabling simulations with fewer compromises.

By speeding up the simulations, the machine will also change the way in which the researchers work, allowing them to be more productive and creative in following up unexpected results.

"If you have a calculation that takes a week for you to complete, you've got to have a lot of different things going on at once while you're waiting for the calculations to be done," Sherrill explains. "But if you could get the results in a couple of hours, you could immediately see what didn't work and how to change it. You could be a lot more interactive and recover more quickly from mistakes."

Based on IBM's new copper chip technology, the machine boasts 47 gigabytes of memory and 764 gigabytes of disk storage. Despite its power, Hernandez isn't advising researchers to discard their test tubes just yet.

"In order to do everything on a computer, we would have to devise a theoretical model able to mimic nature completely," he says. "I believe that we are always going to have surprises from nature."

For more information, contact Rigoberto Hernandez, School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GA 30332-0400. (Telephone: 404-894-0594) (E-mail: hernandez@chemistry.gatech.edu); or David Sherrill, same address. (Telephone: 404-894-4037) (E-mail: david.sherrill@chemistry.gatech.edu)


Contents    Research Horizons    GT Research News    GTRI    Georgia Tech

Send questions and comments regarding these pages to Webmaster@gtri.gatech.edu
Last updated: Feb. 16, 2001