For Immediate Release
Published in the September 27 issue of the journal Science, the report -- by researchers from NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies -- suggests that by absorbing sunlight and altering weather patterns, light absorbing carbon-based particles could have nearly as much impact on global warming as carbon dioxide: a greenhouse gas that has long been considered the primary culprit in global warming. The soot particles are produced by diesel engines, cooking fires and other sources.
In a perspectives article published with the NASA Goddard paper, atmospheric
researchers at the Georgia Institute of Technology describe some of the
policy implications of the new findings. Among them:
"The study reported this week in Science really raises some important policy issues regarding soot," said Michael Bergin, an assistant professor in Georgia Tech's School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences and co-author of the perspectives article. "In the past, researchers have felt that soot didn't really have a significant warming effect. But as we've learned more about the amount of black carbon emitted by countries like China and India, it appears now that soot could have important climatic effects, and that these effects may be almost as much as those of carbon dioxide."
In their perspectives article, Bergin and Professor William
Chameides, also in Georgia Tech's School of Earth and Atmospheric
Sciences, point out the differences between black carbon soot and greenhouse
gases such as carbon dioxide and methane. For instance, soot particles
are removed from the atmosphere on time scales of weeks to months, while
carbon dioxide lingers for hundreds of years. That could point toward
a better near-term control strategy.
"This could be 'low-hanging fruit' in trying to deal with the anthropogenic
(human-caused) effects on the climate," Bergin noted. "From
a policy standpoint, the payoff for controlling soot could be on the scale
of years rather than centuries."
Black carbon creates its warming effect through an entirely different
mechanism than greenhouse gases, which act as an insulating blanket to
keep heat within the earth's atmosphere. Black carbon absorbs light from
the sun, converting that to heat. The effect varies, depending upon what
is beneath the carbon particles.
If a light-colored surface lies below the carbon particles, the heating
effect is increased as incoming photons heat the particles on their way
toward the surface, then heat them again as they reflect off the land
or clouds. The particles are also involved in cloud formation which impacts
precipitation patterns. Those weather changes, seen in regions of China
and India with large soot emissions, may in turn affect the global climate.
"There are a lot of possible atmospheric effects from soot,"
Bergin said. "We really don't yet understand all the feedback cycles
In fact, researchers are just beginning to learn about black carbon soot
- and even to agree on what it is. Formed by the incomplete combustion
from diesel engines, cooking fires and coal burning, black carbon can
take different forms. Depending on the specifics of the combustion process,
soot can take many different forms from spherical particles to chain agglomerates.
"The nature of the particles and how they absorb light could be
different," Bergin explained. "So one gram of soot from one
part of the world could be different from a gram of soot from another
part of the world. We are really at the beginning of trying to understand
the influences of soot on climate. Right now, there is a great deal of
uncertainty in any estimate of the climatological impact of soot."
A key uncertainty is the amount of soot going into the atmosphere. Localized
studies in China and India, where crops wastes are burned for heating
and cooking, show very high levels. In developed nations, elevated soot
levels are found in urban areas - which have often been excluded from
climate studies to avoid confusing global climate change with the local
"urban heat island" effect.
Because nations such as China and India produce so much black carbon,
a new focus on this pollutant could shift control responsibility to the
developing nations. Controlling soot emissions would include developing
more efficient combustion techniques, both for biomass burning and diesel
engines, Bergin added.
The Science report calls into question the accuracy of global
climate change models, which have not considered the effects of black
"This creates some opportunities for climate modelers to revise
their approaches and to add a potentially important anthropogenic climate
forcing agent to their models," said Bergin. "We now have an
opportunity to include more of the important anthropogenic effects. It
could be that there are other feedback cycles in the global climate system
that we don't understand."
Controlling soot could have an impact broader than global climate change.
The tiny particles that appear to be most active in absorbing radiation
are of the size implicated in causing human health effects because they
can lodge deeply in the lungs.
"These health impacts could make it politically much easier for policy-makers to enact the kinds of controls needed," said Bergin. "The control strategy could provide a double-whammy by increasing the health of both human beings and the environment."
RESEARCH NEWS & PUBLICATIONS OFFICE
Georgia Institute of Technology
177 North Avenue NW
Atlanta, Georgia 30332 USA
MEDIA RELATIONS CONTACTS: email@example.com
TECHNICAL CONTACT: Michael Bergin (404-894-9723); E-mail: (firstname.lastname@example.org); Fax: (404-894-8266)
WRITER: John Toon